Review: Stoke’s Grill

At some point, Jeff Bearer (of Craft Beer Radio fame) started suggesting I try out Stoke’s Grill down on McKnight. It didn’t take too much explanation for me ot become interested, and in the past few weeks, I’ve made my way over there—twice. For me, it’s roughly on the way between work and home, so it’s fairly easy to stop by on my way.

Though you can find a veggie option or two, the pickings on that side of the menu are somewhat slim. That drove me to drop my veggie-leaning goal on both visits. The first trip was marred in failure—mostly because I avoided the sandwiches and went for a salad. For the second trip, I corrected myself and was quite pleased.

Stoke’s Grill (West View)
www.stokesgrill.net

4771 McKnight Rd
Pittsburgh, PA 15237
(412) 369-5380

Stoke's Grill on Urbanspoon

Like most establishments on McKnight, Stoke’s is in a strip mall. They’re actually right next door to the North Hills instance of El Campesino—down in the southern section of McKnight. The City Paper review calls them a sandwich shop, but I don’t really think that does them justice. Between the BYOB option and deeply independent status, I think they fall into a slightly different category—though it’s hard to think of a good label. On the other hand, they do put considerable thought in their sandwiches and even avoid the sandwich shop tendency to go overboard on portioning. Basically, I’m a somewhat hesitant fan of the place.

The mixed bag of the strip mall. Despite the often negative perception, that strip mall location does give them the benefit of easy parking and an un-cramped space; they even do a good job of keeping the interior interesting. The walls all get a treatment of alternating dark and light greens behind a spattering of some visually interesting (though eclectic) artwork. That keeps the setting interesting and helps establish their own look. The look actually reminds me of a Juice Box Cafe with higher ceilings.

The dining area is constrained to a single room with booths along the walls, smaller tables on the interior, and a single large-ish round table squeezed somewhere in there near the register. The first time I went (a Friday after work), the round table was completely filled with a dinner group taking full advantage of the BYOB. Even on my second visit (a Wednesday), another group took the larger table (though not quite filling it). Despite the groups on each visit, it was still easy to find a place to sit—though I suspect lunch might be a different story.

Colorful, clean, and in severe need of mustard on the table.

Place your order, pay, and they bring it out to you.

Standard menu with some notable additions. The menu hits on everything you might expect: focussing on sandwiches and wraps but quickly expanding outward to include salads, soups, pretzel sandwiches, and even quesadillas. The soup list is always in motion but was notable in it’s length and diversity—especially given the claim that soups are made daily.

When fried food catches my attention. Though they didn’t catch my eye on either visit, the City Paper’s comments on fries caught my attention. They’re far from a healthy option, but I’d definitely share the green (pesto/artichoke/brie!) fries with a friend or two.

Again, not very healthy, but on my second visit they mistakenly tried to deliver an order of the Flaming Zúcs to my table. The Stoke’s preparation gave a renewed fresh look to an often tired and boring dish. I really wish I had a photo of the lightly breaded rounds from a small (and likely tasty) zucchini. If someone twisted my arm, I might share an order of that as well.

At first glance, not so veggie friendly. The biggest problem with Stokes is the apparent disregard for the veggie crowd. The only vegetarian salads: Caesar and a large dinner salad. The only vegetarian wrap: the Elmer. That said, they do have a build-your-own sandwich option and a vegetarian quesadilla. Plus, I only recently noticed an option to convert sandwiches into salads (for an extra $1.50). It seems the so-so stance on veggies is a little better than it first appears—though another vegetarian specialty sandwich could dramatically improve that appearance.

On my first visit, I was afraid the sandwiches and wraps might be huge and overwhelmed with cheese and meat, but I clearly didn’t give Stoke’s enough credit. On my second trip, I corrected my course by trying a wrap.

Testing the water: large side salad and a cup of chili. I have no one to blame on this visit but myself. I showed up, interested enough to give the place a shot but feeling like being healthy. The lack of interesting vegetarian salads drove me to the large side salad—which had some positive notes (crisp lettuce and a nice house dressing), but lacked much of anything on top: some carrot peals, red onion, and a sparse sprinkle of diced tomato—and some big homemade croutons. For a salad, I would have definitely liked to see more lettuce (and more stuff on top!), but I think this might have been an issue limited to the dinner salad. I saw a Chef Salad go by that looked pretty good.

Ironically, the chili was decidedly non-veg—though it felt necessary given the light salad. Stoke’s actually serves up a fairly large list of soups all prepared in-house and hitting on a variety of different styles. The chili was a pretty good rendition of a particular chili type: ground beef tempered with tomato and beans. You can’t tell from the photo, but the balance of beans to meat is actually fairly decent. With a thin sprinkle of cheese and a nice medium-spicy bite, it was actually pretty good. On that basis, I suspect their other soups are worth trying as well.

Large dinner salad and a cup of chili.

Extreme closeup of the chili

Going for it: the Lucas Wrap. For my second trip, I felt a little more exploratory. The vegetarian wrap option (The Elmer) didn’t spark any enthusiasm so I went non-veg again with a Lucas Wrap. This one includes chicken, lettuce, salsa, and roasted red pepper and was served in just the right portion size. Even with the lettuce in place, it appeared in tight little rolls with a nice balance of veggie to meat. The Lucas also packed a surprising amount of flavor with minimal sloppiness.

I only ate half that night but only because I wasn’t all that hungry. Really, the full potion size felt just right. It wasn’t huge, but felt in control. I might have even eaten the whole thing without feeling too guilty (okay, maybe a little bit). Overall, the wrap was a surprisingly good meal and I suspect far more indicative of Stoke’s Grill.

Lucas Wrap—actually smaller than the perspective suggestions.

I have mixed feelings about Stoke’s Grill. They fall into the category of being exactly the kind of place I’d love to support but just not serving the kind of food I normally eat. I enjoyed some of the food, and I love the BYOB option, and I could have ranted for a full paragraph how exciting it was to get a Diet A&W when I wasn’t planning on a beer. That places it squarely into the category of worth a shot, but not a must try from the FoodBurgh perspective.

Tags: , , ,

5 Responses to “Review: Stoke’s Grill”

  1. Gina Says:
    July 28th, 2010 at 8:51 am

    My thoughts as I read this post:

    1. I miss sandwiches. The last one I had was 8 months ago, a guilt-inducing-but-satisfying trip to the Subway in Delhi.

    2. I miss Pittsburgh, but am excited to experience the changes when we get back (15 months to go!)

    3. I miss you. You are the only person I know who has ever ordered a salad at Primanti Brothers!

    4. I miss you (again). You make awesome wedding cakes and delicious cookies and are a good friend.

    :)

  2. mike Says:
    July 28th, 2010 at 9:58 pm

    Aww. Thanks Gina! I miss you guys too. We’ll get an awesome sandwich together once you guys are back in Pittsburgh!

  3. Jason Says:
    July 31st, 2010 at 2:38 pm

    Stoke’s loves the attention, but this isn’t a fair comparison. I doubt a micro brewery is as dedicated to crisp salads as stokes, or if eggs on lettuce with a bottle of water is “your thing.”. Try the hummus and flatbread with crisp veggies or a Savacow as a salad… We’ve got something for everyone, let us know if we can prove it.

  4. mike Says:
    July 31st, 2010 at 6:08 pm

    Jason: Glad you found the site (and appreciate the attention).

    I don’t think I understand the comparison with a microbrewery issue, but I definitely need to give the “sandwich as a salad” option a try. I actually really wish I would have noticed that possibility prior to writing the commentary/review.

    On the whole, I really liked Stoke’s. I was a little disappointed by the sparse veggie options, but I thought the review was generally positive—though balanced and honest.

  5. Stokes Says:
    September 2nd, 2011 at 5:17 pm

    Dislike your review….Stokes is awesome. You failed to mention a lot of other things about that place that some of your meat eating readers would like. They roast their own cold cuts. Who does that?

    You ate fish but didn’t try their Ruben Gone Fishing which I actually think is one of the best sandwiches in Pittsburgh. That was a HUGE mistep that you did not eat that sandwich.

    Stokes you are an Oasis on the desert of McKnight Road!

Leave a Reply

Email Updates

www.flickr.com
Close It
This work by Mike Beattie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States.